STG-2000 vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking259not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.21no data
Power efficiency6.44no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK110BNV1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed797 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate216.50.08
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs481
TMUs2401

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5FPM
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)1.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 2 Watt

Quadro K6000 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 11150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K6000 and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation graphics card while STG-2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 108 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.