GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 Tesla K40d Tesla K40m Tesla K40s Tesla K40st Tesla K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K6000 with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K6000
2013
12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
20.46
+37.3%

K6000 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking273356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Power efficiency6.4214.02
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK110BGP107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880768
Core clock speed797 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate216.577.76
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS2.488 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs24048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.5+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+33.9%
56
−33.9%
1440p30−35
+20%
25
−20%
4K21−24
+23.5%
17
−23.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p70.20no data
1440p175.50no data
4K250.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+0%
56
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 76
+0%
76
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+0%
55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+0%
52
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how Quadro K6000 and GTX 1050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K6000 is 34% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K6000 is 20% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro K6000 is 24% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 41 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.46 14.90
Recency 23 July 2013 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro K6000 has a 37.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6400
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
Pro Duo Radeon Pro Duo
Quadro K620 NVIDIA K620
vs
RX 570X 570X
Quadro K620 NVIDIA K620
vs
Tesla T4G T4G
Tesla K40st NVIDIA K40st
vs
Tesla M10 M10
Tesla K40st NVIDIA K40st
vs
Tesla P10 P10
Tesla K40c NVIDIA K40c
vs
Tesla P10 P10
NVS 315 NVIDIA 315
vs
RX 6600 XT 6600 XT
Quadro K2000 NVIDIA K2000
vs
GT 520 PCIe x1 520 PCIe x1
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA K4000
vs
R5 220 OEM 220 OEM
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA K4000
vs
Tesla M2090 M2090
Tesla K20c NVIDIA K20c
vs
GTX 550 Ti 550 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 109 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 867 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.