GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs Quadro K600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K600 with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K600
2013
1 GB DDR3, 41 Watt
1.90

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms K600 by a whopping 1976% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking911114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Power efficiency3.1918.10
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107TU104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923072
Core clock speed876 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate14.02299.5
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA3.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−2167%
136
+2167%
1440p4−5
−2250%
94
+2250%
4K3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.17no data
1440p49.75no data
4K66.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Elden Ring 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 265
+0%
265
+0%
Metro Exodus 116
+0%
116
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Valorant 216
+0%
216
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Dota 2 142
+0%
142
+0%
Elden Ring 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 217
+0%
217
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
+0%
136
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 127
+0%
127
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+0%
183
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Elden Ring 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
World of Tanks 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 162
+0%
162
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Elden Ring 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
+0%
97
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+0%
78
+0%
Valorant 89
+0%
89
+0%

This is how Quadro K600 and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 2167% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 2250% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 2133% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 39.45
Recency 1 March 2013 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro K600 has 265.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1976.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K600 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 199 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 133 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.