CMP 170HX vs Quadro K600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking908not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency3.22no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924480
Core clock speed876 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate14.02394.8
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs16280
Tensor Coresno data280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s1,493 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.08.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro K600 has 509.8% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K600 and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 198 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 17 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.