T1000 8 GB vs Quadro K5200

Place in the ranking	337	279
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.11	no data
Power efficiency	7.29	27.20
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GK110B	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014 (10 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,699.74	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	896
Core clock speed	667 MHz	1065 MHz
Boost clock speed	771 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	148.0	78.12
Floating-point processing power	3.553 TFLOPS	2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	192	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	3.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K5200 15.78

T1000 8 GB 19.64
+24.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 6091

T1000 8 GB 7580
+24.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.78	19.64
Recency	22 July 2014	6 May 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt

T1000 8 GB has a 24.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The T1000 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.