Radeon RX 6400 vs Quadro K5200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
15.87

RX 6400 outperforms K5200 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking341279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.2154.04
Power efficiency7.2525.61
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK110BNavi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6400 has 2345% better value for money than Quadro K5200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed667 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0111.4
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs19248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K5200 15.87
RX 6400 19.81
+24.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 6112
RX 6400 7632
+24.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.87 19.81
Recency 22 July 2014 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 53 Watt

Quadro K5200 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 24.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 183% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1978 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.