ATI Radeon 3000 IGP vs Quadro K4200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking414not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.09no data
Power efficiency7.21no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK104RS780
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134440
Core clock speed771 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Wattno data
Texture fill rate87.811.400
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.0
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

Quadro K4200 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4200 and Radeon 3000 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 3000 IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
ATI Radeon 3000 IGP
Radeon 3000 IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 155 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 287 votes

Rate Radeon 3000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.