Arc B580 vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K2 GRID K220Q GRID K260Q GRID K280Q GRID K520 GRID K520Q Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
Arc B570 Arc B580

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4200 with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
9.70

Arc B580 outperforms K4200 by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
Arc B580 Arc B580

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.2888.16
Power efficiency7.1214.50
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGK104BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B580 has 3767% better value for money than Quadro K4200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13442560
Core clock speed771 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate87.81427.2
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs112160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mm272 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA3.0-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K4200 9.70
Arc B580 34.72
+258%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K4200 4334
Arc B580 15513
+258%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−317%
125
+317%
1440p18−20
−278%
68
+278%
4K10−12
−320%
42
+320%

Cost per frame, $

1080p28.50
−1331%
1.99
+1331%
1440p47.50
−1197%
3.66
+1197%
4K85.50
−1342%
5.93
+1342%
  • Arc B580 has 1331% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc B580 has 1197% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc B580 has 1342% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 112
+0%
112
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 134
+0%
134
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 193
+0%
193
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 101
+0%
101
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140
+0%
140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 81
+0%
81
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 236
+0%
236
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Far Cry 5 149
+0%
149
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 69
+0%
69
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 54
+0%
54
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 78
+0%
78
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 32
+0%
32
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Quadro K4200 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 317% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 278% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 320% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.70 34.72
Recency 22 July 2014 16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 190 Watt

Quadro K4200 has 75.9% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 257.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Tesla K20Xm Tesla K20Xm
Arc B580 Arc B580
vs
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
HD 6770 6770
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GTX 1650 TU116 1650 TU116
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB Nano 8 GB
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Pro WX 4200 WX 4200
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Pro WX 8200 WX 8200
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
GeForce 610M 610M
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
R7 350 OEM 350 OEM
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200 4200
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
W5000 DVI DVI
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
FX 2000 2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7
178 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
559 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.