Arc A580 vs Quadro K4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4000M with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

K4000M
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
4.93

Arc A580 outperforms K4000M by a whopping 512% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking628182
Place by popularitynot in top-100100
Power efficiency3.5612.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK104DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)10 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9603072
Core clock speed601 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate48.08384.0
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4000M 4.93
Arc A580 30.19
+512%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K4000M 1902
Arc A580 11648
+512%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K4000M 15362
Arc A580 95677
+523%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K4000M 3466
Arc A580 35210
+916%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K4000M 2199
Arc A580 27574
+1154%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K4000M 19058
Arc A580 113974
+498%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
−152%
106
+152%
1440p9−10
−556%
59
+556%
4K5−6
−580%
34
+580%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−636%
103
+636%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−923%
130−140
+923%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−664%
80−85
+664%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−629%
100−110
+629%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−516%
190−200
+516%
Hitman 3 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−434%
170−180
+434%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−992%
130−140
+992%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−756%
150−160
+756%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−181%
130−140
+181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−629%
102
+629%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1360%
73
+1360%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−923%
130−140
+923%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−664%
80−85
+664%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−629%
100−110
+629%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−516%
190−200
+516%
Hitman 3 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−434%
170−180
+434%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−992%
130−140
+992%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1089%
214
+1089%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−378%
85−90
+378%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−181%
130−140
+181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−357%
64
+357%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1180%
64
+1180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−664%
80−85
+664%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−172%
87
+172%
Hitman 3 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−241%
109
+241%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−883%
177
+883%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−278%
68
+278%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−27.7%
60
+27.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−800%
80−85
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−980%
54
+980%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 51
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1817%
230−240
+1817%
Hitman 3 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−691%
87
+691%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2933%
91
+2933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1275%
55
+1275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−519%
190−200
+519%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−700%
70−75
+700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2250%
180−190
+2250%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2600%
50−55
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6000%
61
+6000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1300%
56
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+0%
73
+0%

This is how K4000M and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 152% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 556% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 580% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A580 is 6000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is ahead in 63 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.93 30.19
Recency 1 June 2012 10 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 175 Watt

K4000M has 75% lower power consumption.

Arc A580, on the other hand, has a 512.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4000M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Quadro K4000M
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Quadro K4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 249 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.