Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs Quadro K2200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking475not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.15no data
Power efficiency9.42no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM107G80
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)5 March 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64096
Core clock speed1046 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt154 Watt
Texture fill rate44.9624.00
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.2304 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length202 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB768 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s67.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 5 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 768 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 154 Watt

Quadro K2200 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 126.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2200 and Quadro FX 4600 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
Quadro FX 4600 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 417 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.