GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K620 Quadro K1200 Quadro K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2200 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K2200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 68 Watt
9.27

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms K2200 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking476274
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Power efficiency9.3827.92
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM107TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed1046 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate44.9695.04
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA5.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.27
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+119%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K2200 3564
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+119%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−146%
59
+146%
1440p18−20
−139%
43
+139%
4K10−12
−150%
25
+150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p16.49no data
1440p21.99no data
4K39.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Elden Ring 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 98
+0%
98
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Elden Ring 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+0%
75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
+0%
29
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+0%
63
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Quadro K2200 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 146% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 139% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.27 20.28
Recency 22 July 2014 23 April 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 118.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6 8Q
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GRID K520 GRID K520
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 422 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1718 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.