GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro K2100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2100M with GeForce GTX 1660, including specs and performance data.

K2100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.53

GTX 1660 outperforms K2100M by a whopping 758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking725186
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6348.17
Power efficiency4.4017.30
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK106TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$84.95 $219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 has 7546% better value for money than K2100M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5761408
Core clock speed667 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate32.02157.1
Floating-point processing power0.7684 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed752 MHz2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.0 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2100M 3.53
GTX 1660 30.28
+758%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2100M 1360
GTX 1660 11669
+758%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K2100M 2394
GTX 1660 21064
+780%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K2100M 10648
GTX 1660 71229
+569%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K2100M 1606
GTX 1660 14164
+782%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K2100M 11835
GTX 1660 81755
+591%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K2100M 4541
GTX 1660 57961
+1176%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

K2100M 4104
GTX 1660 56067
+1266%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

K2100M 3028
GTX 1660 60172
+1887%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

K2100M 18
GTX 1660 120
+574%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

K2100M 32
GTX 1660 49
+56%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

K2100M 21
+143%
GTX 1660 9

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

K2100M 21
GTX 1660 60
+190%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

K2100M 20
GTX 1660 40
+103%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

K2100M 6
GTX 1660 27
+375%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

K2100M 11
GTX 1660 63
+496%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

K2100M 0
GTX 1660 6
+1833%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−261%
83
+261%
1440p5−6
−880%
49
+880%
4K3−4
−767%
26
+767%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.692.64
1440p16.994.47
4K28.328.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1083%
71
+1083%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1314%
95−100
+1314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−813%
73
+813%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−867%
58
+867%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−670%
75−80
+670%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−725%
160−170
+725%
Hitman 3 9−10
−667%
69
+667%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1124%
306
+1124%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−2300%
144
+2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1144%
112
+1144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−650%
100−110
+650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−454%
227
+454%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1130%
123
+1130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1314%
95−100
+1314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−738%
67
+738%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−683%
47
+683%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−670%
75−80
+670%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−725%
160−170
+725%
Hitman 3 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1048%
287
+1048%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1783%
113
+1783%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−778%
79
+778%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−686%
110
+686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−156%
60−65
+156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−422%
214
+422%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1750%
37
+1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−513%
49
+513%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−567%
40
+567%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−390%
98
+390%
Hitman 3 9−10
−556%
59
+556%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−272%
93
+272%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−579%
95
+579%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−280%
57
+280%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+41.4%
29
−41.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−800%
81
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−850%
55−60
+850%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1033%
34
+1033%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−17300%
170−180
+17300%
Hitman 3 8−9
−388%
39
+388%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−750%
187
+750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−657%
53
+657%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10
Far Cry 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−550%
26
+550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
+0%
27
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+0%
67
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 21
+0%
21
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+0%
63
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+0%
36
+0%

This is how K2100M and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 261% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 880% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 767% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K2100M is 41% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 17300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • K2100M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 1660 is ahead in 62 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.53 30.28
Recency 23 July 2013 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 120 Watt

K2100M has 118.2% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has a 757.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 280 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5335 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.