Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs Quadro K2000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2000M with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.

K2000M
2012
2 GB DDR3, 55 Watt
2.62

RX 6750 GRE outperforms K2000M by a whopping 1785% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3747.39
Power efficiency3.2613.54
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 22
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$265.27 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 GRE has 12708% better value for money than K2000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed745 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate23.84413.0
Floating-point processing power0.5722 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1664
TMUs32160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2000M 2.62
RX 6750 GRE 49.40
+1785%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2000M 1010
RX 6750 GRE 19031
+1784%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−1639%
400−450
+1639%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.531.37

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1746%
240−250
+1746%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1567%
350−400
+1567%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1718%
200−210
+1718%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1742%
700−750
+1742%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1746%
240−250
+1746%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1567%
350−400
+1567%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1718%
200−210
+1718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1746%
240−250
+1746%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1742%
700−750
+1742%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1746%
240−250
+1746%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1567%
350−400
+1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1718%
200−210
+1718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1746%
240−250
+1746%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1742%
700−750
+1742%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1775%
150−160
+1775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1757%
130−140
+1757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−1767%
280−290
+1767%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%

This is how K2000M and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE is 1639% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.62 49.40
Recency 1 June 2012 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 250 Watt

K2000M has 354.5% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 1785.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Quadro K2000M
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 228 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.