GeForce MX570 vs Quadro K2000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2000M with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

K2000M
2012
2 GB DDR3, 55 Watt
2.62

MX570 outperforms K2000M by a whopping 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking817355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Power efficiency3.2740.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$265.27 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed745 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate23.8473.92
Floating-point processing power0.5722 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2000M 2.62
GeForce MX570 14.88
+468%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2000M 1010
GeForce MX570 5735
+468%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−465%
130−140
+465%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.53no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−638%
95−100
+638%
Hitman 3 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−262%
75−80
+262%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−336%
45−50
+336%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−105%
75−80
+105%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−638%
95−100
+638%
Hitman 3 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−262%
75−80
+262%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−336%
45−50
+336%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−105%
75−80
+105%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−638%
95−100
+638%
Hitman 3 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−262%
75−80
+262%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−336%
45−50
+336%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−105%
75−80
+105%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−507%
90−95
+507%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 6−7

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how K2000M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 465% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.62 14.88
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 467.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Quadro K2000M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.