Quadro NVS 285 vs Quadro K1200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1200 and Quadro NVS 285, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro K1200
2015
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.64
+6845%

K1200 outperforms NVS 285 by a whopping 6845% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5271445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.69no data
Power efficiency11.630.42
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGM107NV44 A2
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 January 2015 (9 years ago)6 June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 $27.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1058 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate35.971.100
Floating-point processing power1.151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length160 mm168 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitDDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x DMS-59
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K1200 7.64
+6845%
NVS 285 0.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K1200 2943
+6907%
NVS 285 42

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.64 0.11
Recency 28 January 2015 6 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro K1200 has a 6845.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 285, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 285 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Quadro NVS 285

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 102 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.