Radeon RX 5700 vs Quadro K1100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1100M with Radeon RX 5700, including specs and performance data.

K1100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.83

RX 5700 outperforms K1100M by a whopping 1221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking796125
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0644.79
Power efficiency4.3114.24
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 10
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109.94 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 has 4125% better value for money than K1100M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed706 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate22.59248.4
Floating-point processing power0.5422 TFLOPS7.949 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data268 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1100M 2.83
RX 5700 37.38
+1221%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1100M 1090
RX 5700 14403
+1221%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1100M 1827
RX 5700 31470
+1623%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K1100M 8992
RX 5700 91993
+923%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K1100M 1341
RX 5700 23746
+1671%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K1100M 9228
RX 5700 132911
+1340%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K1100M 3025
RX 5700 68813
+2175%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

K1100M 2953
RX 5700 64069
+2070%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

K1100M 14
RX 5700 116
+735%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

K1100M 33
RX 5700 106
+217%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

K1100M 15
RX 5700 42
+177%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

K1100M 16
RX 5700 162
+894%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

K1100M 16
RX 5700 78
+396%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

K1100M 6
RX 5700 43
+675%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

K1100M 9
RX 5700 131
+1340%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

K1100M 0
RX 5700 12
+2900%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

K1100M 9
RX 5700 127
+1295%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

K1100M 16
RX 5700 136
+733%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−571%
114
+571%
1440p5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
4K3−4
−1267%
41
+1267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.473.06
1440p21.995.06
4K36.658.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1580%
84
+1580%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−756%
77
+756%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−9600%
97
+9600%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−4400%
180
+4400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1357%
102
+1357%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2140%
112
+2140%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1138%
99
+1138%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1820%
288
+1820%
Hitman 3 8−9
−850%
76
+850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1236%
294
+1236%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4700%
144
+4700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1514%
113
+1514%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1033%
130−140
+1033%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−582%
259
+582%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1344%
130
+1344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7900%
80
+7900%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−3525%
145
+3525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1214%
92
+1214%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1240%
67
+1240%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1700%
90
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1025%
90
+1025%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1740%
276
+1740%
Hitman 3 8−9
−838%
75
+838%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1223%
291
+1223%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4667%
143
+4667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1300%
98
+1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1358%
175
+1358%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−239%
75−80
+239%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−539%
243
+539%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−567%
60
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7600%
77
+7600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−871%
68
+871%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1180%
64
+1180%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−687%
118
+687%
Hitman 3 8−9
−813%
73
+813%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−441%
119
+441%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1192%
155
+1192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−2175%
91
+2175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−52.6%
58
+52.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1357%
102
+1357%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1940%
102
+1940%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1725%
73
+1725%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2450%
51
+2450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2400%
50
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1633%
52
+1633%
Hitman 3 8−9
−588%
55
+588%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1229%
93
+1229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−1335%
244
+1335%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1067%
70
+1067%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1850%
39
+1850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 70
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−775%
35
+775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 267
+0%
267
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+0%
108
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 39
+0%
39
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
+0%
116
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%

This is how K1100M and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 571% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 1280% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 1267% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5700 is 9600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 37.38
Recency 23 July 2013 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 180 Watt

K1100M has 300% lower power consumption.

RX 5700, on the other hand, has a 1220.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 223 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1795 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.