Radeon RX 640 vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with Radeon RX 640, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
51.34
+903%

Quadro GV100 outperforms RX 640 by a whopping 903% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking48589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.7412.69
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameGV100Polaris 12
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data
Current price$5183 (0.6x MSRP)$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 640 has 168% better value for money than Quadro GV100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120640
Core clock speed1132 MHz1218 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate520.638.98
Floating-point performance14,817 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro GV100 and Radeon RX 640 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1696 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSyncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GV100 51.34
+903%
RX 640 5.12

Quadro GV100 outperforms Radeon RX 640 by 903% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro GV100 19824
+903%
RX 640 1976

Quadro GV100 outperforms Radeon RX 640 by 903% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD280−290
+900%
28
−900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 200−210
+900%
20
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+900%
12−14
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+900%
14−16
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+900%
24−27
−900%
Hitman 3 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+900%
24−27
−900%
Metro Exodus 270−280
+900%
27
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 260−270
+900%
26
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+900%
16−18
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+900%
21−24
−900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+900%
12−14
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+900%
14−16
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+900%
24−27
−900%
Hitman 3 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+900%
24−27
−900%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+900%
14−16
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+900%
16−18
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200−210
+900%
20
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+900%
21−24
−900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+900%
24−27
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+900%
24−27
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+900%
16−18
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+900%
11
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+900%
21−24
−900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+900%
14−16
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+900%
8−9
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+900%
8−9
−900%
Hitman 3 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Hitman 3 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+900%
5−6
−900%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+900%
6−7
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+900%
6−7
−900%

This is how Quadro GV100 and RX 640 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.34 5.12
Recency 27 March 2018 12 August 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 902.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

RX 640, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 640 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 640 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
AMD Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 52 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 248 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.