Radeon 535 Mobile vs Quadro GV100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Power efficiency14.33no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGV100Polaris 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120384
Core clock speed1132 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate520.624.58
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs1288
TMUs32024
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB2 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2018 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro GV100 has an age advantage of 11 months, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

535 Mobile, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro GV100 and Radeon 535 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation card while Radeon 535 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Radeon 535 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 52 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Radeon 535 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.