GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

Quadro FX 4000 Quadro FX 4400 Quadro FX 4500 Quadro FX 4500 X2 Quadro FX 4600 Quadro FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4800
VS
RTX 4050 RTX 4060 RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB RTX 4070 RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4080 RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4080 Ti RTX 4090 RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4700 X2 with GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

FX 4700 X2
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 226 Watt
1.75

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms FX 4700 X2 by a whopping 4985% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FX 4700 X2 FX 4700 X2
RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9275
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0138.30
Power efficiency0.5319.06
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG92AD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 SUPER has 382900% better value for money than FX 4700 X2.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12810240
Core clock speed600 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2550 MHz
Number of transistors754 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)226 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40816.0
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs64320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm310 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s736.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4700 X2 1.75
RTX 4080 SUPER 88.99
+4985%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 4700 X2 676
RTX 4080 SUPER 34284
+4972%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−5120%
261
+5120%
1440p3−4
−5933%
181
+5933%
4K2−3
−5750%
117
+5750%

Cost per frame, $

1080p599.803.83
1440p999.675.52
4K1499.508.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 235
+0%
235
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 281
+0%
281
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 342
+0%
342
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 237
+0%
237
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 568
+0%
568
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 158
+0%
158
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 209
+0%
209
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 322
+0%
322
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 425
+0%
425
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 527
+0%
527
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 263
+0%
263
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 145
+0%
145
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 135
+0%
135
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 165
+0%
165
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 345
+0%
345
+0%
Metro Exodus 171
+0%
171
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 397
+0%
397
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221
+0%
221
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 96
+0%
96
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 99
+0%
99
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 305
+0%
305
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 201
+0%
201
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 81
+0%
81
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

This is how FX 4700 X2 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 5120% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 5933% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 5750% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.75 88.99
Recency 18 April 2008 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 226 Watt 320 Watt

FX 4700 X2 has 41.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 4985.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4700 X2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4700 X2 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Quadro FX 4700 X2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4700 X2
vs
NVS 510 NVS 510
RTX 4080 SUPER GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
FX 4700 X2 Quadro FX 4700 X2
vs
FireStream 9170 FireStream 9170
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
Plex 7000 Quadro Plex 7000
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
vs
HD 6670 Radeon HD 6670
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
ATI M7740 FirePro M7740
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
FX 5600 Quadro FX 5600
Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
FX 5800 GeForce FX 5800
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
ATI HD 3870 Radeon HD 3870
FX 1400 Quadro FX 1400
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4700 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1996 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.