Radeon R7 350 640SP vs Quadro FX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV40Cape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 April 2004 (22 years ago)7 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed375 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors222 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate4.50037.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1240
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2004 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 55 Watt

R7 350 640SP has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 158% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4000 and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4000 or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.