ATI Radeon SDR vs Quadro FX 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1301not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.11no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameG96Rage 6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2009 (17 years ago)1 June 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors314 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6001
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs86
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 1 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 23 Watt

FX 380 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 177% more advanced lithography process.

ATI SDR, on the other hand, has 48% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380 and Radeon SDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon SDR is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380 or Radeon SDR, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.