Radeon R9 360 OEM vs Quadro FX 350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1372not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.72no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG72Tobago
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed550 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors112 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate2.20050.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm165 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s104.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 85 Watt

FX 350 has 304.8% lower power consumption.

R9 360 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Radeon R9 360 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 360 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 2086 votes

Rate Radeon R9 360 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.