Radeon RX 560 XT vs Quadro FX 3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV45Ellesmere
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2004 (21 years ago)13 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed350 MHz973 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1073 MHz
Number of transistors222 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)101 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate5.600120.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.846 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs16112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s211.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 13 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 101 Watt 150 Watt

FX 3400 has 49% lower power consumption.

RX 560 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3400 and Radeon RX 560 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 281 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3400 or Radeon RX 560 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.