Radeon RX 6900 vs Quadro FX 330

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated21
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.91
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV37Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2004 (20 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2105 MHz
Number of transistors45 million23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000606.2
Floating-point processing powerno data19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 255 Watt

FX 330 has 1114.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 330 and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 330 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 66 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.