Radeon RX 6500M vs Quadro FX 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)RDNA 2 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameNV37Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2004 (20 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2191 MHz
Number of transistors45 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000153.6
Floating-point performanceno data4.915 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 50 Watt

FX 330 has 138.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 330 and Radeon RX 6500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 330 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 6500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330
AMD Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 488 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.