Radeon RX 6400 vs Quadro FX 3000G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.48
Power efficiencyno data26.92
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV35Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2003 (22 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed400 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2321 MHz
Number of transistors135 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data53 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200111.4
Floating-point processing powerno data3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2003 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm

RX 6400 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2067% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3000G and Radeon RX 6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3000G is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2482 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000G or Radeon RX 6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.