GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Quadro FX 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3000 with GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 3000
2003
256 MB DDR
0.16

RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms FX 3000 by a whopping 30338% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking144866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data74.24
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNV35GB206
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2003 (21 years ago)April 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$203 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed400 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors135 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200205.2
Floating-point processing powerno data13.13 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 5.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3000 0.16
RTX 5070 Mobile 48.70
+30338%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3000 69
RTX 5070 Mobile 20629
+29797%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1109
1440p-0−169
4K-0−130

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 222
+0%
222
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 163
+0%
163
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 144
+0%
144
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 48.70
Recency 22 July 2003 on April 2025
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RTX 5070 Mobile has a 30337.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Quadro FX 3000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 39 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000 or GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.