GeForce Go 7400 vs Quadro FX 2700M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.02no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG94G72
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores487
Core clock speed530 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistors505 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.721.800
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed799 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.14 GB/s7.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 2700M 366
+463%
Go 7400 65

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 1 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm

FX 2700M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2700M and GeForce Go 7400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2700M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce Go 7400 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Quadro FX 2700M
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
GeForce Go 7400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.