ATI FirePro V4800 vs Quadro FX 1800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1095not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.21no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG94Redwood
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)26 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$489 $189

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64400
Core clock speed550 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors505 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6015.50
Floating-point processing power0.176 TFLOPS0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs128
TMUs3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount768 MB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 69 Watt

FX 1800 has 16.9% lower power consumption.

ATI V4800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1800 and FirePro V4800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Quadro FX 1800
ATI FirePro V4800
FirePro V4800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 131 vote

Rate Quadro FX 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 55 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.