GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro FX 1700M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1700M with GeForce RTX 4060, including specs and performance data.

FX 1700M
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 50 Watt
0.45

RTX 4060 outperforms FX 1700M by a whopping 11356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123849
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency0.6331.26
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG96AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323072
Core clock speed625 MHz1830 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2460 MHz
Number of transistors314 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate10.00236.2
Floating-point processing power0.0992 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1696
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2125 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s272.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 1700M 0.45
RTX 4060 51.55
+11356%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1700M 172
RTX 4060 19884
+11460%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−14500%
146
+14500%
1440p0−174
4K-0−146

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.05
1440pno data4.04
4Kno data6.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−6850%
139
+6850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4850%
95−100
+4850%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5250%
107
+5250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2600%
100−110
+2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2388%
190−200
+2388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4825%
190−200
+4825%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−407%
140−150
+407%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4850%
95−100
+4850%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90
+4400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2600%
100−110
+2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2388%
190−200
+2388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5325%
217
+5325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1067%
100−110
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−407%
140−150
+407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4850%
95−100
+4850%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3900%
80
+3900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2600%
100−110
+2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2388%
190−200
+2388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4650%
190
+4650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1144%
112
+1144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−407%
140−150
+407%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 48
Hitman 3 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−5750%
110−120
+5750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4300%
85−90
+4300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 35−40

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 111
+0%
111
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+0%
129
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
+0%
70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how FX 1700M and RTX 4060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is 14500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4060 is 6850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.45 51.55
Recency 1 October 2008 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

FX 1700M has 130% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060, on the other hand, has a 11355.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1700M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1700M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Quadro FX 1700M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17372 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.