GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Quadro FX 1600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1600M with GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FX 1600M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 50 Watt
0.58

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms FX 1600M by a whopping 4093% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1212224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.8328.97
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG84GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2007 (17 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149.90 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322560
Core clock speed625 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Number of transistors289 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate10.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-HEno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_2
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−6900%
70
+6900%
1440p0−137

Cost per frame, $

1080p149.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−967%
32
+967%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1650%
105
+1650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−264%
40
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
23
+667%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1113%
97
+1113%
Fortnite 1−2
−12500%
120−130
+12500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1333%
86
+1333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1656%
150−160
+1656%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
World of Tanks 16−18
−1418%
250−260
+1418%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−533%
19
+533%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1167%
76
+1167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1656%
150−160
+1656%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%
World of Tanks 2−3
−8250%
160−170
+8250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1750%
70−75
+1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−825%
37
+825%
Valorant 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−7600%
75−80
+7600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Dota 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Valorant 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how FX 1600M and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 6900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 12500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 33 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 24.32
Recency 1 June 2007 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 60 Watt

FX 1600M has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4093.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1600M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Quadro FX 1600M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 710 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.