GeForce 8400 GS vs Quadro FX 1500

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 1500 with GeForce 8400 GS, including specs and performance data.

FX 1500
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.38
+8.6%

FX 1500 outperforms 8400 GS by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12601267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.460.69
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G86
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $29.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed325 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors278 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate7.8003.672
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length173 mm170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 1500 0.38
+8.6%
8400 GS 0.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1500 169
+8.3%
8400 GS 156

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.35
Recency 20 April 2006 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 40 Watt

FX 1500 has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score.

8400 GS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 1500 and GeForce 8400 GS.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1500 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500
Quadro FX 1500
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 8400 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 34 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 643 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1500 or GeForce 8400 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.