ATI Wii GPU vs Quadro CX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking833not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency1.14no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGT200BHollywood
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)19 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed602 MHz243 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate38.530.97
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPSno data
ROPs244
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz243 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s3.888 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 19 November 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 45 Watt

Quadro CX has an age advantage of 1 year, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Wii GPU, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro CX and Wii GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro CX is a workstation card while Wii GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro CX
Quadro CX
ATI Wii GPU
Wii GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro CX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate Wii GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.