Radeon 780M vs Quadro 6000 SDI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated298
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Power efficiencyno data85.04
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF100Hawx Point
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448768
Core clock speed574 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)231 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14129.6
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs5648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length248 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed747 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDIPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 231 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 1440% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 6000 SDI and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 6000 SDI is a workstation card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
Quadro 6000 SDI
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 9 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1475 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.