ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO vs Quadro 500M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking977not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.94no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGF108Rage 4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)16 June 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz120 MHz
Number of transistors585 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate11.200.48
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SGR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz120 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s1.92 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 16 June 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 250 nm

Quadro 500M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 500M and All-In-Wonder 128 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 500M is a mobile workstation card while All-In-Wonder 128 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Quadro 500M
ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.