GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs Quadro 5000M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M with GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000M
2010
1792 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
4.61

RTX 5090 Mobile outperforms 5000M by a whopping 1305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.6654.12
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGF100GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32010496
Core clock speed405 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1515 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate16.20496.9
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs40328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 5000M 4.61
RTX 5090 Mobile 64.78
+1305%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059
RTX 5090 Mobile 28948
+1306%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1281%
290−300
+1281%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Fortnite 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1268%
260−270
+1268%
Valorant 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1281%
290−300
+1281%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−1295%
1200−1250
+1295%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Dota 2 40−45
−1210%
550−600
+1210%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Fortnite 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1268%
260−270
+1268%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Valorant 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1281%
290−300
+1281%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Dota 2 40−45
−1210%
550−600
+1210%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−1268%
260−270
+1268%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Valorant 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−1216%
500−550
+1216%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1186%
450−500
+1186%
Valorant 55−60
−1264%
750−800
+1264%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Valorant 24−27
−1300%
350−400
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.61 64.78
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 5090 Mobile has a 1305.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 1271.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 5.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 72 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.