GeForce GT 240 vs Quadro 5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M with GeForce GT 240, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000M
2010
1792 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.23
+309%

5000M outperforms GT 240 by a whopping 309% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6251041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiency3.671.30
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF100GT215
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)17 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed405 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt69 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105C C
Texture fill rate16.2017.60
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB512 MB or 1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s54.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDVIVGAHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.2
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 5000M 5.23
+309%
GT 240 1.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059
+309%
GT 240 503

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 5000M 7767
+48.8%
GT 240 5221

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+300%
25
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Fortnite 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Valorant 60−65
+87.9%
30−35
−87.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+207%
27−30
−207%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Fortnite 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 60−65
+87.9%
30−35
−87.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 60−65
+87.9%
30−35
−87.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Valorant 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how Quadro 5000M and GT 240 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 5000M is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro 5000M is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro 5000M surpassed GT 240 in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.23 1.28
Recency 27 July 2010 17 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 512 MB or 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 69 Watt

Quadro 5000M has a 308.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

GT 240, on the other hand, has a 29157.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 44.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 240 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 939 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or GeForce GT 240, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.