A100 SXM4 80 GB vs Quadro 5000M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking608not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.70no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF100GA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)16 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206912
Core clock speed405 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate16.20609.1
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs40432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2010 16 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 400 Watt

Quadro 5000M has 300% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 4471.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 5000M and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 58 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.