Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Quadro 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300 XT 6400 6500 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT 6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 410 with Radeon RX 6500 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 410
2012, $149
512 MB DDR3, 38 Watt
1.04

6500 XT outperforms 410 by a whopping 2114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
RX 6500 XT RX 6500 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1145270
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0547.08
Power efficiency2.1116.57
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6500 XT has 94060% better value for money than Quadro 410.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921024
Core clock speed706 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2815 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt107 Watt
Texture fill rate11.30180.2
Floating-point processing power0.2711 TFLOPS5.765 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache16 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length176 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.26 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 410 1.04
RX 6500 XT 23.03
+2114%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 410 435
Samples: 126
RX 6500 XT 9631
+2114%
Samples: 3012

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−3050%
63
+3050%
1440p1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
4K0−117

Cost per frame, $

1080p74.50
−2259%
3.16
+2259%
1440p149.00
−2221%
6.42
+2221%
4Kno data11.71
  • RX 6500 XT has 2259% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT has 2221% lower cost per frame in 1440p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 281
+0%
281
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 72
+0%
72
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 77
+0%
77
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 52
+0%
52
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+0%
34
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Dota 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Quadro 410 and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is 3050% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT is 3000% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.04 23.03
Recency 7 August 2012 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 107 Watt

Quadro 410 has 182% lower power consumption.

RX 6500 XT, on the other hand, has a 2114% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6500 XT
vs
GTX 970 GeForce GTX 970
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
Quadro K5000 NVIDIA Quadro K5000
vs
NVS 280 SD NVS 280 SD
Quadro K5000 NVIDIA Quadro K5000
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
Quadro 410 NVIDIA Quadro 410
vs
HD 7970 X2 HD 7970 X2
Quadro 410 NVIDIA Quadro 410
vs
NVS 315 NVS 315
Quadro 410 NVIDIA Quadro 410
vs
ATI 7000 PCI Radeon 7000 PCI
Quadro 410 NVIDIA Quadro 410
vs
T400 Mobile Quadro T400 Mobile
Quadro 410 NVIDIA Quadro 410
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
Quadro 410 NVIDIA Quadro 410
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU Max 30-Core GPU
K5000 Mac Edition NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
RX 540X RX 540X
NVS 310 NVIDIA NVS 310
vs
ATI HD 5490 HD 5490

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3900 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 410 or Radeon RX 6500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.