GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs Quadro 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 4000 with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 4000
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 142 Watt
3.75

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms 4000 by a whopping 929% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
RTX 2080 Super Mobile RTX 2080 Super

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking714115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency1.8518.06
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100TU104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2 November 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563072
Core clock speed475 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate15.20299.5
Floating-point processing power0.4864 TFLOPS9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs32192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed702 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.86 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA2.07.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−1075%
141
+1075%
1440p9−10
−1011%
100
+1011%
4K6−7
−1050%
69
+1050%

Cost per frame, $

1080p99.92no data
1440p133.22no data
4K199.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 178
+0%
178
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 171
+0%
171
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
+0%
136
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 198
+0%
198
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 136
+0%
136
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 52
+0%
52
+0%

This is how Quadro 4000 and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 1075% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 1011% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 1050% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.75 38.58
Recency 2 November 2010 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro 4000 has 5.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 928.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 4000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
RTX 2080 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
Quadro 600 600
vs
GT 730M GT 730M
Quadro 4000 4000
vs
R5 230 R5 230
Quadro 4000 4000
vs
GT 710 OEM GT 710 OEM
Quadro 4000 4000
vs
ATI 9000 9000
Quadro 4000 4000
vs
FX 5600 Mac Edition FX 5600 Mac Edition
FX 380 LP FX 380 LP
vs
PRO W7800 PRO W7800
NVS 295 NVS 295
vs
R5 235X OEM R5 235X OEM
FX 580 FX 580
vs
FX 1300 FX 1300
FX 580 FX 580
vs
FX 1400 FX 1400
FX 3800 FX 3800
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 188 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 133 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 4000 or GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.