GeForce FX 5200 LE vs Quadro 4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking704not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Power efficiency1.88no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF100NV34 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 November 2010 (14 years ago)17 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed475 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Wattno data
Texture fill rate15.201.000
Floating-point processing power0.4864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed702 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.86 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 November 2010 17 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

Quadro 4000 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000 and GeForce FX 5200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 LE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 LE
GeForce FX 5200 LE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 187 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 10 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.