GeForce RTX 3090 vs Quadro 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated19
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.92
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGT216Ampere GA102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 April 2011 (13 years ago)24 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4810496
Core clock speed450 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors486 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200556.0
Floating-point performance108 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length163 mm313 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1540 MHz19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.32 GB/s936.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.28.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 400 148
RTX 3090 26772
+17989%

GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Quadro 400 by 17989% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2011 24 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 350 Watt

Quadro 400 has 993.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 400 and GeForce RTX 3090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 400
Quadro 400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 78631 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.