RTX A4500 Mobile vs Quadro 2000M

Place in the ranking	882	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.28	no data
Power efficiency	2.56	22.50
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF106	GA104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 January 2011 (13 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$46.56	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	5888
Core clock speed	550 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.60	276.0
Floating-point processing power	0.4224 TFLOPS	17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	32	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000M 2.02

RTX A4500 Mobile 45.20
+2138%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 2000M 778

RTX A4500 Mobile 17438
+2141%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−2062%

800−850
+2062%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

1.26

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2025%	170−180 +2025%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2025%	170−180 +2025%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2025%	85−90 +2025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2025%	170−180 +2025%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2025%

85−90
+2025%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −2082%	240−250 +2082%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+150%

2−3

−150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−2000%

21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how Quadro 2000M and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A4500 Mobile is 2062% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro 2000M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Quadro 2000M surpassed RTX A4500 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.02	45.20
Recency	13 January 2011	22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	140 Watt

Quadro 2000M has 154.5% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2137.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.