GeForce G100 OEM vs Quadro 2000M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking888not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Power efficiency2.52no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF106G98
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 January 2011 (13 years ago)10 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$46.56 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1928
Core clock speed550 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate17.604.320
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2011 10 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro 2000M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

G100 OEM, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 2000M and GeForce G100 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce G100 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro 2000M
NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
GeForce G100 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 206 votes

Rate GeForce G100 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.