FirePro W4190M vs Quadro 2000M

Place in the ranking	888	778
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.28	no data
Power efficiency	2.52	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	GF106	Opal
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 January 2011 (13 years ago)	12 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$46.56	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	384
Core clock speed	550 MHz	825 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	900 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	17.60	21.60
Floating-point processing power	0.4224 TFLOPS	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	32	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000M 2.02

W4190M 2.98
+47.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 2000M 778

W4190M 1150
+47.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 2000M 1261

W4190M 2351
+86.4%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro 2000M 3414

W4190M 5166
+51.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

37
+236%

−236%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

1.26

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−50%

6−7
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +100%	6 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −11.4%	35−40 +11.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−75%

7−8
+75%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−100%

2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−33.3%

4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

0−1

This is how Quadro 2000M and W4190M compete in popular games:

Quadro 2000M is 236% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro 2000M is 100% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the W4190M is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games: