Radeon 620 vs Quadro 1000M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 1000M with Radeon 620, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 1000M
2011
2 GB DDR3, 45 Watt
1.26

620 outperforms 1000M by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1008862
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Power efficiency2.223.28
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF108Polaris 24
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 January 2011 (14 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$174.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed700 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate11.2024.58
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 1000M 1.26
Radeon 620 2.07
+64.3%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 1000M 561
Radeon 620 927
+65.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
−55.6%
70−75
+55.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.89no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Fortnite 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Valorant 30−35
−20.6%
40−45
+20.6%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Fortnite 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−20.6%
40−45
+20.6%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−20.6%
40−45
+20.6%
Fortnite 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 2−3
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Valorant 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how Quadro 1000M and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 620 is 56% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 620 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 620 is ahead in 41 test (76%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 2.07
Recency 13 January 2011 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro 1000M has 11.1% lower power consumption.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has a 64.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 1000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 620 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro 1000M
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4
123 votes

Rate Quadro 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2
65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 1000M or Radeon 620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.