GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 vs Quadro 1000M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking985not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Power efficiency2.28no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF108NV31M
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$174.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965
Core clock speed700 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate11.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DDR
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2011 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm

Quadro 1000M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 1000M and GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 1000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro 1000M
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 122 votes

Rate Quadro 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.