Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Playstation 4 Slim GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated78
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.40
Power efficiencyno data17.52
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLiverpool 16nmNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 September 2016 (8 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11522048
Core clock speed800 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate57.60337.3
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs72128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Length288 mmno data
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s280.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1*12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 September 2016 10 May 2022
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 176 Watt

Playstation 4 Slim GPU has 134.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Slim GPU and Radeon RX 6650 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3291 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.