Radeon 780M vs Playstation 4 Slim GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated300
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameLiverpool 16nmPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 September 2016 (8 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152768
Core clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate57.60139.2
Floating-point performance1.843 gflops8.909 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Length288 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5.5 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1*12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 September 2016 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 54 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Slim GPU and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 122 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1306 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.