RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Playstation 4 Slim GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated17
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.82
Power efficiencyno data16.74
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLiverpool 16nmAD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 September 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores115218176
Core clock speed800 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate57.601,423
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs72568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Length288 mm267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1*12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 September 2016 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

Playstation 4 Slim GPU has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 4 Slim GPU and RTX 6000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 127 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 77 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.